<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Bing is Better&#8221; than Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wasiqansari.com/index.php/2009/07/bing-is-better-than-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wasiqansari.com/index.php/2009/07/bing-is-better-than-google/</link>
	<description>The New Blog of Latest News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxi</title>
		<link>http://blog.wasiqansari.com/index.php/2009/07/bing-is-better-than-google/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wasiqansari.com/?p=25#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else think that NY Times is partial to anything non-Google considering all the hell they raised about Google displaying their precious news snippets?

I would trust a review from them on other topics. But they are known G haters. Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else think that NY Times is partial to anything non-Google considering all the hell they raised about Google displaying their precious news snippets?</p>
<p>I would trust a review from them on other topics. But they are known G haters. Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funzu</title>
		<link>http://blog.wasiqansari.com/index.php/2009/07/bing-is-better-than-google/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Funzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wasiqansari.com/?p=25#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I have been using Google for quite some time now. But , for a while now I haven&#039;t been getting the results I used to expect from the search giant. They have been pretty much the same sites popping up (Wiki, Youtube, etc.) on top of a maybe a couple good results and mixed with a whole lot of sites that are of very little value (just web page shells). Really there isn&#039;t much for me to continue to use in the way of search to keep me at Google.

So far Bing has given me a good mix. Yes, some junk is in there but pretty up to par with Google. I love the image search on bing, the interface, and how the results are presented. I love the little side bar that open up. As a webmaster I thought that wouldn&#039;t be a wise thing to do. After seeing and using it, I love it. So yes I am switching to bing for a while and using Google as a secondary. A bit of change for me after Google this, Google that, Google it, etc.

Someone I was talking to told me to &quot;Google it.&quot; Me a webmaster being told to Google something. I think they forgot the fact. Anyway, I said &quot;Google it? Man you are behind times&quot; Bing is the new search craze. Try it and you will like it. Talked to him a few days ago and asked him if he liked it. He said pretty much the same thing I said above. He liked the results, the interface, the side window that opens, image search, etc.

This is just my thoughts and experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Google for quite some time now. But , for a while now I haven&#8217;t been getting the results I used to expect from the search giant. They have been pretty much the same sites popping up (Wiki, Youtube, etc.) on top of a maybe a couple good results and mixed with a whole lot of sites that are of very little value (just web page shells). Really there isn&#8217;t much for me to continue to use in the way of search to keep me at Google.</p>
<p>So far Bing has given me a good mix. Yes, some junk is in there but pretty up to par with Google. I love the image search on bing, the interface, and how the results are presented. I love the little side bar that open up. As a webmaster I thought that wouldn&#8217;t be a wise thing to do. After seeing and using it, I love it. So yes I am switching to bing for a while and using Google as a secondary. A bit of change for me after Google this, Google that, Google it, etc.</p>
<p>Someone I was talking to told me to &#8220;Google it.&#8221; Me a webmaster being told to Google something. I think they forgot the fact. Anyway, I said &#8220;Google it? Man you are behind times&#8221; Bing is the new search craze. Try it and you will like it. Talked to him a few days ago and asked him if he liked it. He said pretty much the same thing I said above. He liked the results, the interface, the side window that opens, image search, etc.</p>
<p>This is just my thoughts and experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariese</title>
		<link>http://blog.wasiqansari.com/index.php/2009/07/bing-is-better-than-google/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wasiqansari.com/?p=25#comment-10</guid>
		<description>As much as I&#039;d love Google to have some real competition, Google results were still significantly better last time I checked (today).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I&#8217;d love Google to have some real competition, Google results were still significantly better last time I checked (today).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.wasiqansari.com/index.php/2009/07/bing-is-better-than-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wasiqansari.com/?p=25#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I give it a try and it&#039;s nice that I can get the image i needed easily than in google.

but i turn back to google again and again. My toolbar, which has a gmail notifier so important to me, is set with google. The current features of Bing is just not revolutionary to make us move.

It&#039;s nice to see there&#039;s a great alternative to google, but it&#039;s an alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give it a try and it&#8217;s nice that I can get the image i needed easily than in google.</p>
<p>but i turn back to google again and again. My toolbar, which has a gmail notifier so important to me, is set with google. The current features of Bing is just not revolutionary to make us move.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see there&#8217;s a great alternative to google, but it&#8217;s an alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blog.wasiqansari.com/index.php/2009/07/bing-is-better-than-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wasiqansari.com/?p=25#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I just wish it worked better with Opera. Also I&#039;m always getting mixed results because of the geotargeting. I&#039;m in Japan and if I search for an English term I always get Japanese pages first.

Regardless, I&#039;m giving Bing a long hard look. I have it set as default browser on several PCs. I still have to jump to Google occasionally, unfortunately.

Nice to see the NYT article pointing out some of these areas where Bing does better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wish it worked better with Opera. Also I&#8217;m always getting mixed results because of the geotargeting. I&#8217;m in Japan and if I search for an English term I always get Japanese pages first.</p>
<p>Regardless, I&#8217;m giving Bing a long hard look. I have it set as default browser on several PCs. I still have to jump to Google occasionally, unfortunately.</p>
<p>Nice to see the NYT article pointing out some of these areas where Bing does better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sana</title>
		<link>http://blog.wasiqansari.com/index.php/2009/07/bing-is-better-than-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Sana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wasiqansari.com/?p=25#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Finally, someone who is not a Google fanboy gave it the review it deserves.

More people need to tell more people and so on and so forth and before you know it, Google will no longer be the 800lb Gorilla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, someone who is not a Google fanboy gave it the review it deserves.</p>
<p>More people need to tell more people and so on and so forth and before you know it, Google will no longer be the 800lb Gorilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

